Developers of the residential building are taking fire for
violating regulations in the area.
Casco Antiguo has become the scene of many ambitious renovation
projects in recent years.
| Eric Batista/LA PRENSA |
|
|
| NON-COMPLIANCE:A project to restore a colonial-era structure in
Panama’s old town defies restrictions on height and changes to historical
facades.1167081 |
|
Across from the Cathedral park in San Felipe’s Casco Antiguo, a
major renovation is taking place, but not all are pleased with this particular
attempt at revamping the infrastructure of the old town.
According to Hildegard Vásquez, president of the Fundación
Calicanto, the project, PH Plaza Independencia, “violates” the established norms
on height and modifications permitted to the facade of buildings in the old
city, known for its historically-preserved French colonial-style architecture,
which offers a refreshing distinction from nearby Avenida Balboa's starkly
contrasting NYC-influenced skyline.
Vásquez cited Decree Law No. 9 of Aug. 27, 1997, which requires
developers in the area to “maintain the existing facade of the buildings.” The
legal doctrine also states that "we must preserve any existing ramps in their
original form,” and that “adding new stories to the front of the building, the
roof is prohibited and the front should be constructed to its original tilt and
form.”
Defying these regulations, a new ramp has been added to the
restored structure for an underground garage, and the inclination and height of
the roof have been altered to accommodate two additional floors, said
Vásquez.
Charles Fitzgerald, former director of the historic heritage
council for the national cultural institute (INAC), said that refurbished
buildings must not exceed their original height because it contradicts the
ambiance of the historic site.
Rodney Zelenka, owner of the building, commented that the project
complies “with all of the permits.”
And, technically, he is correct. The plans were approved by
INAC’s department of historical heritage back in August of 1999.
Vásquez is set to investigate the person responsible for
approving these plans because the project did not in fact comply with the
legally-established specifications.
INAC officials have yet to comment.